Substrate Report for: Naphthalene-1,2-epoxide

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (HYL1) is a single-gene enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of epoxides derived from the oxidative metabolism of xenobiotics. Variation in HYL1, therefore, may be an important determinant of drug toxicity. We have investigated HYL1 enzyme kinetics in six different species including man, for which a liver bank genotyped for polymorphisms in exons 3 and 4 of the HYL1 gene was used. Activity was measured by radiochromatography with high specific activity radiolabeled substrates, cis-stilbene oxide (CSO) and carbamazepine 10,11-epoxide (CBZ-E). In addition, naphthalene was used to investigate the hydrolysis of an epoxide (naphthalene 1,2-epoxide [N-E] generated in situ. There was marked species variation in enzyme activity that was substrate dependent. CSO was rapidly hydrolyzed by microsomes from all species, the rank order of specific activity being human > rabbit > dog > rat > hamster > mouse. In contrast, hydrolysis of CBZ-E was only observed with human liver microsomes. CBZ-E was only a weak (IC50 = 1 mM) inhibitor of CSO hydrolysis. The hydrolysis of N-E, determined as the diol-to-total metabolite ratio, was human > rabbit > dog > hamster > mouse > rat. Intraspecies variation in man was 4-fold, 7-fold and 2-fold for CSO, CBZ-E and N-E, respectively: none of this variation could be directly accounted for by the HYL1 polymorphisms in exons 3 and 4. These data emphasize the need for careful toxicokinetic evaluation of species used in the safety evaluation of compounds likely to form epoxide intermediates in vivo.

Epoxide hydrolase (EC 3.3.2.3) was purified to electrophoretic homogeneity from human liver cytosol by using hydrolytic activity toward trans-8-ethylstyrene 7,8-oxide (TESO) as an assay. The overall purification was 400-fold. The purified enzyme has an apparent monomeric molecular weight of 58 000, significantly greater than the 50 000 found for human (or rat) liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase or for another TESO-hydrolyzing enzyme also isolated from human liver cytosol. Purified cytosolic TESO hydrolase catalyzes the hydrolysis of cis-8-ethylstyrene 7,8-oxide 10 times more rapidly than does the microsomal enzyme, catalyzes the hydrolysis of TESO and trans-stilbene oxide as rapidly as the microsomal enzyme, but catalyzes the hydrolysis of styrene 7,8-oxide, p-nitrostyrene 7,8-oxide, and naphthalene 1,2-oxide much less effectively than does the microsomal enzyme. Purified cytosolic TESO hydrolase does not hydrolyze benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide, a substrate for the microsomal enzyme. The activities of the purified enzymes can explain the specific activities observed with subcellular fractions. Anti-human liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase did not recognize cytosolic TESO hydrolase in purified form or in cytosol, as judged by double-diffusion immunoprecipitin analysis, precipitation of enzymatic activity, and immunoelectrophoretic techniques. Cytosolic TESO hydrolase and microsomal epoxide hydrolase were also distinguished by peptide mapping. The results provide evidence that physically different forms of epoxide hydrolase exist in different subcellular fractions and can have markedly different substrate specificities.

The comparative hydration of styrene 7,8-oxide, octene 1,2-oxide, naphthalene 1,2-oxide, phenanthrene 9,10-oxide, benzo[a]anthracene 5,6-oxide, 3-methylcholanthrene 11,12-oxide, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 5,6-oxide, and benzo[a, 7,8-, 9,10-, and 11,12-oxides to their respective dihydrodiols was investigated in microsomes from nine human autopsy livers. The substrate specificity of the epoxide hydrase in human liver microsomes was very similar to that of the epoxide hydrase in rat liver microsomes. Phenanthrene 9,10-oxide was the best substrate for the human and rat epoxide hydrases and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 5,6-oxide and benzo[a-a)pyrene 11, 12-oxide were the poorest substrates. Plotting epoxide hydrase activity obtained with one substrate against epoxide hydrase activity for another substrate for each of the nine human livers revealed excellent correlations for all combinations of the 11 substrates studied (r = 0.87 to 0.99). The data suggest the presence in human liver of a single epoxide hydrase with broad substrate specificity. However, the results do not exclude the possible presence in human liver of several epoxide hydrases that are under similar regulatory control. These results suggest the need for further investigation to determine whether there is a safe epoxide of a drug whose in vivo metabolism is predictive of the capacity of different individuals to metabolize a wide variety of epoxides of drugs and environmental chemicals.