Inhibitor Report for: Benextramine

The concept that polyamines may represent a universal template in the receptor recognition process is embodied in the design of ligands for different biological targets. As a matter of fact, the insertion of different pharmacophores onto the polymethylene tetraamine backbone can tune both affinity and selectivity for any given receptor. The application of this approach provided a prospect of modifying benextramine (1). structure to achieve specific recognition of muscarinic receptors that led to the discovery of methoctramine (2). which is widely used as a pharmacological tool for muscarinic receptor characterization. In turn, appropriate structural modifications performed on the structure of methoctramine led to the discovery of new polyamines endowed with high affinity and selectivity for (a). muscarinic receptor subtypes, (b). G(i) proteins, and (c). muscle-type nicotinic receptors. Thus, polyamines tripitramine (9) and spirotramine (33), among others, were designed, which were shown to be highly selective for muscarinic M(2) and M(1) receptors, respectively. Several polyamines have been discovered, which inhibit noncompetitively a closed state of the nicotinic receptor. These ligands, such as 66, resulted in important tools for elucidating the mode and site of interaction of polyamines with the ion channel. It was discovered that reducing the flexibility of the diaminohexane spacer of methoctramine led to polyamines, such as 70, which are endowed with a biological profile significantly different from that of the prototype. Most likely, tetraamine (70) is a potent activator of G(i) proteins. Finally, the universal template approach formed the basis for modifying benextramine (1) structure to the design of ligands, which display affinity for acetylcholinesterase and muscarinic M(2) receptors. Thus, these polyamines, such as caproctamine (78), could have potential in the investigation of Alzheimer disease.

In low concentrations (0.3-3 muM) the tetramine disulfide benextramine (BHC; N,N'-bis[6-(o-methoxybenzylamino)-n-hexyl]cystamine) potentiated the contracture of the isolated frog rectus abdominis muscle caused by acetylcholine but in the presence of physostigmine or in a higher concentration (10 muM) it inhibited. Benextramine only inhibited the contracture caused by carbachol or butyrylcholine. The all-carbon analog of benextramine only inhibited the effect of acetylcholine. The inhibitory effects of benextramine and its carbon analog were noncompetitive and readily reversible but the potentiating effect of benextramine was not readily reversible.

The concept that polyamines may represent a universal template in the receptor recognition process is embodied in the design of ligands for different biological targets. As a matter of fact, the insertion of different pharmacophores onto the polymethylene tetraamine backbone can tune both affinity and selectivity for any given receptor. The application of this approach provided a prospect of modifying benextramine (1). structure to achieve specific recognition of muscarinic receptors that led to the discovery of methoctramine (2). which is widely used as a pharmacological tool for muscarinic receptor characterization. In turn, appropriate structural modifications performed on the structure of methoctramine led to the discovery of new polyamines endowed with high affinity and selectivity for (a). muscarinic receptor subtypes, (b). G(i) proteins, and (c). muscle-type nicotinic receptors. Thus, polyamines tripitramine (9) and spirotramine (33), among others, were designed, which were shown to be highly selective for muscarinic M(2) and M(1) receptors, respectively. Several polyamines have been discovered, which inhibit noncompetitively a closed state of the nicotinic receptor. These ligands, such as 66, resulted in important tools for elucidating the mode and site of interaction of polyamines with the ion channel. It was discovered that reducing the flexibility of the diaminohexane spacer of methoctramine led to polyamines, such as 70, which are endowed with a biological profile significantly different from that of the prototype. Most likely, tetraamine (70) is a potent activator of G(i) proteins. Finally, the universal template approach formed the basis for modifying benextramine (1) structure to the design of ligands, which display affinity for acetylcholinesterase and muscarinic M(2) receptors. Thus, these polyamines, such as caproctamine (78), could have potential in the investigation of Alzheimer disease.

The universal template approach to drug design foresees that a polyamine can be modified in such a way to recognize any neurotransmitter receptor. Thus, hybrids of polymethylene tetraamines and philanthotoxins, exemplified by methoctramine (1) and PhTX-343 (2), respectively, were synthesized to produce novel inhibitors of muscular nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Polyamines 3-25 were synthesized and their biological profiles were evaluated at frog rectus abdominis muscle nicotinic receptors and guinea pig left atria (M(2)) and ileum longitudinal muscle (M(3)) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. All of the compounds, like prototypes 1 and 2, were noncompetitive antagonists of nicotinic receptors while being, like 1, competitive antagonists at muscarinic M(2) and M(3) receptor subtypes. Interestingly, polyamines bearing a low number of methylenes between the nitrogen atoms, as in 3, 6, and 7, displayed a biological profile similar to that of 2: a noncompetitive antagonism at nicotinic receptors in the 7-25 microM range while not showing any antagonism for muscarinic receptors up to 10 microM. Increasing the number of methylenes separating these nitrogen atoms in methoctramine-related tetraamines resulted in a significant improvement in potency at nicotinic receptors. The most potent tetraamine was 19, bearing a 12 methylene spacer between the nitrogen atoms, which was 12-fold and 250-fold more potent than prototypes 1 and 2, respectively. Tetraamines 9-11, bearing a rather rigid spacer between the nitrogen atoms instead of the very flexible polymethylene chain, displayed a profile similar to that of 1 at nicotinic receptors, whereas a significant decrease in potency was observed at muscarinic M(2) receptors. This finding may have relevance in understanding the mode of interaction with these receptors. Similarly, the constrained analogue 12 of methoctramine showed a decrease in potency at nicotinic and muscarinic M(2) receptors, revealing that the tricyclic system, which incorporates the 2-methoxybenzylamine moiety of 1, does not represent a good pharmacophore for activity at these sites. A most intriguing finding was the observation that the photolabile tetraamine 22 was more potent than methoctramine at nicotinic receptors and, what is more important, it inhibited a closed state of the receptor.

The concept that polyamines may represent a universal template in the receptor recognition process is embodied in the design of new selective muscarinic ligands. Tetraamines 4-7 and 16-20 and diamine diamides 8-15 were synthesized, and their pharmacological profiles at muscarinic receptor subtypes were assessed by functional experiments in isolated guinea pig left atrium (M2) and ileum (M3) and by binding assays in rat cortex (M1), heart (M2), submaxillary gland (M3), and NG 108-15 cells (M4). It has been confirmed that appropriate substituents on the terminal nitrogens of a tetraamine template can tune both affinity and selectivity for muscarinic receptors. The novel tetraamine C-tripitramine (17) was able to discriminate significantly M1 and M2 receptors versus the other subtypes, and in addition it was 100-fold more lipophilic than the lead compound tripitramine. Compound 14 (tripinamide), in which the tetraamine backbone was transformed into a diamine diamide one, retained high affinity for muscarinic subtypes, displaying a binding affinity profile (M2 > M1 > M4 > M3) qualitatively similar to that of tripitramine. Both these ligands, owing to their improved lipophilicity relative to tripitramine and methoctramine, could serve as tools in investigating cholinergic functions in the central nervous system. Furthermore, notwithstanding the fact that the highest affinity was always associated with muscarinic M2 receptors, for the first time polyamines were shown to display high pA2 values also toward muscarinic M3 receptors.

1. In order to characterize the neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1 receptors known to be present in rabbit isolated vas deferens and saphenous vein, the pharmacological activity of the selective NPY Y1 receptor agonists, [Leu31,Pro34] NPY and various other peptide agonists, together with the putative NPY antagonist, benextramine, were compared in the two tissues. 2. In rabbit isolated saphenous vein, cumulative dose-response curves to various NPY agonists were obtained. All the peptides tested caused contractions which developed quite slowly. The rank order of potency obtained was: PYY > NPY > [Leu31,Pro34] NPY = NPY2-36 > hPP >> NPY13-36 = NPY18-36. Incubation with benextramine (BXT) at 100 microM for 30 min irreversibly abolished the contractile response to [Leu31,Pro34] NPY but was ineffective against NPY18-36-induced contractions. 3. Cumulative dose-response curves to [Leu31,Pro34] NPY were performed in the same preparation before and after incubation with 100 microM BXT for 20 min in order to inactivate NPY Y1 receptors. The pKA (-logKA) estimation for [Leu31,Pro34] NPY was 7.60 +/- 0.30 using the operational model and 7.20 +/- 0.33 using the null method; the difference between the two methods was not statistically significant (P = 0.36). 4. Prostatic segments of rabbit vas deferens were electrically stimulated with single pulses. Immediately after stabilization of the contractile response, a cumulative dose-response curve to various NPY agonists was obtained in each tissue. The rank order of potency for twitch inhibition was: PYY> [Leu31,Pro34]NPY > NPY > hPP>NPY2- 36 >>NPY13-36>> NPY 18-36 which indicates the presence of a prejunctional NPY Y1 receptor. BXT at 100 microM incubated for 10 or 60 min did not antagonize the response to[Leu31,Pro34] NPY.5. We conclude that rabbit isolated saphenous vein contains a population of post-junctional NPY Y1 receptors irreversibly blocked by BXT, as well as a population of post-junctional NPY Y2 receptors,which are insensitive to BXT. In contrast, the rabbit isolated vas deferens express a pre-junctional NPYY1 receptor subtype which is not blocked by BXT. Tetramine disulphides such as BXT could be useful tools in classifying NPY receptors.

1. The pharmacological activity of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and some analogues in inhibiting the twitch contractions induced by electrical stimulation (single pulses at 25 V, 0.15 Hz, 1 ms) in the prostatic portion of the rat isolated vas deferens was investigated. The rank order of agonist potency was: PYY > NPY2-36 > NPY >> NPY13-36 >> NPY18-36 >> [Leu31,Pro34]NPY = hPP, which is consistent with the activation of a Y2 receptor. 2. The putative Y1 and Y2 antagonist, benextramine (BXT), incubated at 100 microM for 10 or 60 min, was ineffective against PYY-induced inhibition of the twitch response, suggesting that the prejunctional Y2 receptor in this tissue is different from the postjunctional one reported in the literature to be sensitive to BXT blockade. 3. The putative NPY antagonist, PYX-2, incubated at 1 microM for 20 min, was completely ineffective in antagonizing PYY-induced inhibition of twitches. 4. The twitch response was totally inhibited by suramin (100 microM) but was little affected by prazosin (1 microM). Furthermore, NPY was without effect on the dose-response curve to ATP in resting conditions. Taken together, these results suggest that in our paradigm, NPY inhibits the release of a purinergic neurotransmitter which mediates contraction of the prostatic portion of the rat vas deferens.

Binding studies in rat whole brain, frontoparietal cortex and brainstem membrane preparations revealed that benextramine displaced [3H]neuropeptide Y specific binding from a low and a high affinity site with IC50 values in the microM (36 +/- 2, 4.4 +/- 1.4 and 300 +/- 120 microM, respectively) and the pM (29.3 +/- 12.1, 0.35 +/- 0.11 and 0.42 +/- 0.03 pM, respectively) range, whereas in rat hippocampus benextramine displaced [3H]neuropeptide Y specific binding from one site only with an IC50 value of 22.8 +/- 5.7 microM. With the exception of frontoparietal cortex binding assay, benextramine was not able to completely inhibit [3H]neuropeptide Y specific binding revealing the presence of a benextramine nonsensitive third binding site. Benextramine pretreatment followed by membrane washing demonstrated that benextramine inhibited irreversibly both high and low affinity sites.

The possibility that polymethylene tetraamines act as divalent ligands has been explored. Structure-activity relationship studies among polymethylene tetraamines have shown that four nitrogens are necessary for high affinity binding to M2 receptors while being less important for M3 muscarinic receptors. Replacement of one terminal methoxybenzyl group of the potent and selective muscarinic antagonist methoctramine by different moieties led to weaker antagonists suggesting that the two terminal nitrogens of methoctramine interact with two similar receptor sites. Data are presented which suggest that methoctramine might interact with four acidic residues of the receptor: two residues are buried in the third transmembrane segment whereas the others are located extracellularly on the loop 4-5 which may represent the allosteric site where several antagonists such as gallamine bind. An hypothetical model describing the interaction of methoctramine with the M2 receptor is proposed. It may provide a useful working hypothesis for the design of new selective muscarinic ligands.

In low concentrations (0.3-3 muM) the tetramine disulfide benextramine (BHC; N,N'-bis[6-(o-methoxybenzylamino)-n-hexyl]cystamine) potentiated the contracture of the isolated frog rectus abdominis muscle caused by acetylcholine but in the presence of physostigmine or in a higher concentration (10 muM) it inhibited. Benextramine only inhibited the contracture caused by carbachol or butyrylcholine. The all-carbon analog of benextramine only inhibited the effect of acetylcholine. The inhibitory effects of benextramine and its carbon analog were noncompetitive and readily reversible but the potentiating effect of benextramine was not readily reversible.