(Below N is a link to NCBI taxonomic web page and E link to ESTHER at designed phylum.) > cellular organisms: NE > Bacteria: NE > Proteobacteria: NE > Alphaproteobacteria: NE > Sphingomonadales: NE > Sphingomonadaceae: NE > Sphingomonas: NE > Sphingomonas paucimobilis: NE
Warning: This entry is a compilation of different species or line or strain with more than 90% amino acid identity. You can retrieve all strain data
(Below N is a link to NCBI taxonomic web page and E link to ESTHER at designed phylum.) Pseudomonas paucimobilis: N, E.
Sphingomonas paucimobilis NBRC 13935: N, E.
Sphingomonas sp. NM05: N, E.
Sphingobium japonicum UT26S: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa C3719: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2192: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa VRFPA04: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa VRFPA01: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LESB58: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa UCBPP-PA14: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA7: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 39016: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL12: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO581: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MPAO1/P2: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 14886: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL01: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 700888: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 25324: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL16: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH050: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa DHS01: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA005: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA003: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PADK2_CF510: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa VRFPA05: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA028: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa M9A.1: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA21_ST175: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA046: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa UDL: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA027: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3574: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa CF127: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1-VE13: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA024: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA1: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA043: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa DK2: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL05: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH035: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa VRFPA02: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa C51: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa S54485: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA001: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA019: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA002: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA038: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH051: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA047: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA022: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL03: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3577: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa str. Stone 130: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa c7447m: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA044: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa C52: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL25: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 18A: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LESlike5: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1-VE2: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3576: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3573: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL17: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa U2504: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL24: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa CF5: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL22: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA007: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1-GFP: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa VRFPA08: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa M8A.4: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA015: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa S35004: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO579: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa M8A.1: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa VRFPA06: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa CIG1: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL06: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LESlike1: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MSH-10: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL07: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA1R: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa M10: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa IGB83: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL02: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA020: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ID4365: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa C40: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 19660: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA004: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTB-1: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH036: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA010: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LESlike7: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3581: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH030: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa C41: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa VRFPA07: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH057: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa HB13: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH059: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa CF27: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA99: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa HB15: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH049: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LESlike4: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa CF77: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MH27: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa SCV20265: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH032: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA008: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL11: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL04: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA014: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH053: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH054: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa CF614: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCGM2.S1: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MSH10: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3579: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MSH3: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa C20: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH058: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Z61: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa YL84: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA018: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH055: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL15: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA042: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA021: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa CF18: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH033: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 148: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA103: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL23: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MPAO1/P1: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3580: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 62: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6077: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa C48: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA041: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA023: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA045: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL14: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL08: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA017: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA039: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa DHS29: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa CI27: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa X24509: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA040: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3578: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PS75: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa RP73: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA013: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA96: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa E2: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH031: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa JJ692: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MH38: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa B136-33: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA009: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA38182: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa WC55: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA026: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa X13273: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa C23: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL18: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa SG17M: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA45: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH060: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA016: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCMG1179: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA025: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH029: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL21: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL20: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA006: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa M18: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA037: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAK: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH056: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL09: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PS50: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA011: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL19: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa M8A.2: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWH052: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BWHPSA012: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LES400: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL10: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa VRFPA03: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LES431: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PS42: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BL13: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa M8A.3: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LESB65: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3575: N, E.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa DK1: N, E.
Sphingomonas sp. MM-1: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. SS04-3: N, E.
Sphingomonas sp. HZ-1: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. P21: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. P8: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. P1: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. P12: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. MI1205: N, E.
Plasmid pLB1: N, E.
uncultured bacterium: N, E.
uncultured bacteria: N, E.
Sphingobium japonicum: N, E.
Sphingobium japonicum BiD32: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. SS04-4: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. SS04-1: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. SS04-5: N, E.
uncultured organism: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. HDIP04: N, E.
Sphingobium ummariense RL-3: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. SS04-2: N, E.
Sphingomonas sp. BHC-A: N, E.
Sphingobium sp. P7: N, E.
Sphingobium indicum B90A: N, E.
Xanthomonas sp. ICH12: N, E.
Molecular evidence
Database
No mutation 17 structures(e.g. : 1CV2, 1D07, 1G42... more)(less) 1CV2: Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb from Sphingomonas Paucimobilis UT26 at 1.6 A resolution, 1D07: Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb From Sphingomonas Paucimobilis Ut26 With 1,3-Propanediol, A Product Of Debromidation of Dibrompropane, At 2.0a Resolution, 1G42: Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb from Sphingomonas Paucimobilis Complexed With 1,2-Dichloropropane, 1G4H: Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb from Sphingomonas Paucimobilis complexed with Butan-1-Ol, 1G5F: Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb from Sphingomonas Paucimobilis Complexed With 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1IZ7: Re-Refinement Of The Structure Of Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb From Sphingomonas Paucimobilis Ut26 At 1.6 A Resolution, 1IZ8: Re-Refinement Of The Structure Of Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb From Sphingomonas Paucimobilis Ut26 With 1,3-Propanediol, A Product Of Debromidation Of Dibrompropane, At 2.0a Resolution, 1K5P: Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb from Sphingomonas Paucimobilis UT26 at 1.8A resolution, 1K63: Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb from Sphingomonas Paucimobilis UT26 at 1.8A resolution with 2-bromo-2-propene-1-ol, 1K6E: Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb from Sphingomonas Paucimobilis UT26 at 1.8A resolution with 1,2-propanediol (product of dehalogenation of 1,2-dibromopropane), 1MJ5: Hydrolytic Haloalkane Dehalogenase Linb from Sphingomonas Paucimobilis UT26 at 1.8A resolution, 2BFN: crystal structure of the complex of the haloalkane dehalogenase LinB with the product of dehalogenation reaction 1,2-dichloropropane, 4WDQ: Crystal structure of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB32 mutant (L177W) from Sphingobium japonicum UT26, 4WDR: Crystal structure of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB 140A+143L+177W+211L mutant (LinB86) from Sphingobium japonicum UT26, 5LKA: Crystal structure of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB 140A+143L+177W+211L mutant (LinB86) from Sphingobium japonicum UT26 at 1.3 A resolution, 6S06: Crystal structure of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB D147C+L177C mutant (LinB73) from Sphingobium japonicum UT26, 7NFZ: Crystal structure of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB57 mutant (H272F) from Sphingobium japonicum UT26 No kinetic
LegendThis sequence has been compared to family alignement (MSA) red => minority aminoacid blue => majority aminoacid color intensity => conservation rate title => sequence position(MSA position)aminoacid rate Catalytic site Catalytic site in the MSA MSLGAKPFGEKKFIEIKGRRMAYIDEGTGDPILFQHGNPTSSYLWRNIMP HCAGLGRLIACDLIGMGDSDKLDPSGPERYAYAEHRDYLDALWEALDLGD RVVLVVHDWGSALGFDWARRHRERVQGIAYMEAIAMPIEWADFPEQDRDL FQAFRSQAGEELVLQDNVFVEQVLPGLILRPLSEAEMAAYREPFLAAGEA RRPTLSWPRQIPIAGTPADVVAIARDYAGWLSESPIPKLFINAEPGALTT GRMRDFCRTWPNQTEITVAGAHFIQEDSPDEIGAAIAAFVRRLRPA
The activity of enzymes with active sites buried inside their protein core highly depends on the efficient transport of substrates and products between the active site and the bulk solvent. The engineering of access tunnels in order to increase or decrease catalytic activity and specificity in a rational way is a challenging task. Here, we describe a combined experimental and computational approach to characterize the structural basis of altered activity in the haloalkane dehalogenase LinB D147C+L177C variant. While the overall protein fold is similar to the wild type enzyme and the other LinB variants, the access tunnels have been altered by introduced cysteines that were expected to form a disulfide bond. Surprisingly, the mutations have allowed several conformations of the amino acid chain in their vicinity, interfering with the structural analysis of the mutant by X-ray crystallography. The duration required for the growing of protein crystals changed from days to 1.5 years by introducing the substitutions. The haloalkane dehalogenase LinB D147C+L177C variant crystal structure was solved to 1.15 A resolution, characterized and deposited to Protein Data Bank under PDB ID 6s06
Substrate inhibition is the most common deviation from Michaelis-Menten kinetics, occurring in approximately 25% of known enzymes. It is generally attributed to the formation of an unproductive enzyme-substrate complex after the simultaneous binding of two or more substrate molecules to the active site. Here, we show that a single point mutation (L177W) in the haloalkane dehalogenase LinB causes strong substrate inhibition. Surprisingly, a global kinetic analysis suggested that this inhibition is caused by binding of the substrate to the enzyme-product complex. Molecular dynamics simulations clarified the details of this unusual mechanism of substrate inhibition: Markov state models indicated that the substrate prevents the exit of the halide product by direct blockage and/or restricting conformational flexibility. The contributions of three residues forming the possible substrate inhibition site (W140A, F143L and I211L) to the observed inhibition were studied by mutagenesis. An unusual synergy giving rise to high catalytic efficiency and reduced substrate inhibition was observed between residues L177W and I211L, which are located in different access tunnels of the protein. These results show that substrate inhibition can be caused by substrate binding to the enzyme-product complex and can be controlled rationally by targeted amino acid substitutions in enzyme access tunnels.
Haloalkane dehalogenases are microbial enzymes that convert a broad range of halogenated aliphatic compounds to their corresponding alcohols by the hydrolytic mechanism. These enzymes play an important role in the biodegradation of various environmental pollutants. Haloalkane dehalogenase LinB isolated from a soil bacterium Sphingobium japonicum UT26 has a relatively broad substrate specificity and can be applied in bioremediation and biosensing of environmental pollutants. The LinB variants presented here, LinB32 and LinB70, were constructed with the goal of studying the effect of mutations on enzyme functionality. In the case of LinB32 (L117W), the introduced mutation leads to blocking of the main tunnel connecting the deeply buried active site with the surrounding solvent. The other variant, LinB70 (L44I, H107Q), has the second halide-binding site in a position analogous to that in the related haloalkane dehalogenase DbeA from Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA94. Both LinB variants were successfully crystallized and full data sets were collected for native enzymes as well as their complexes with the substrates 1,2-dibromoethane (LinB32) and 1-bromobutane (LinB70) to resolutions ranging from 1.6 to 2.8 A. The two mutants crystallize differently from each other, which suggests that the mutations, although deep inside the molecule, can still affect the protein crystallizability.
The activity of enzymes with active sites buried inside their protein core highly depends on the efficient transport of substrates and products between the active site and the bulk solvent. The engineering of access tunnels in order to increase or decrease catalytic activity and specificity in a rational way is a challenging task. Here, we describe a combined experimental and computational approach to characterize the structural basis of altered activity in the haloalkane dehalogenase LinB D147C+L177C variant. While the overall protein fold is similar to the wild type enzyme and the other LinB variants, the access tunnels have been altered by introduced cysteines that were expected to form a disulfide bond. Surprisingly, the mutations have allowed several conformations of the amino acid chain in their vicinity, interfering with the structural analysis of the mutant by X-ray crystallography. The duration required for the growing of protein crystals changed from days to 1.5 years by introducing the substitutions. The haloalkane dehalogenase LinB D147C+L177C variant crystal structure was solved to 1.15 A resolution, characterized and deposited to Protein Data Bank under PDB ID 6s06
        
Title: Protocol for in-vitro purification and refolding of hexachlorocyclohexane degrading enzyme haloalkane dehalogenase LinB from inclusion bodies Kaur J, Singh A, Panda AK, Lal R Ref: Enzyme Microb Technol, 146:109760, 2021 : PubMed
LinB is an important haloalkane dehalogenase involved in the degradation pathway of different isomers of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), mainly in catalyzing degradation of the notorious beta-HCH. The HCH isomers are known to have neurotoxic, carcinogenic and estrogenic effects. Enzymatic bioremediation for decontamination of beta- as well as other HCH isomers can prove to be a potential remediation strategy. For any bioremediation technology that is to be developed, apart from having high turnover number, the candidate enzyme must also be available in sufficient amounts. In this direction, the LinB variants reported in database were tested in laboratory studies. The variant LinBSSO4-3 however could not be obtained in soluble fraction by using standard procedures. The protein LinBSSO4-3 was cloned in pDEST17 vector and codon optimized for better expression in Escherichia coli BL21AI using a strong T7 promoter. However, the over-expression of this protein in ectopic host E. coli, led to aggregation of the protein in form of inclusion bodies, which are insoluble aggregates of misfolded or partially folded proteins. SEM analysis of the inclusion bodies showed them as aggregated spherical particles. The inclusion bodies were isolated using high speed sonication and homogenization. This was followed by solubilization in the strong denaturing agent urea. Refolding into its native state was done by using pulsatile refolding. This was done by slowly decreasing the denaturant concentration in the presence of sucrose. The turnover number of the refolded protein was then determined for different isomers of HCH. The protein was found to have a turnover number of -43 molecules min(-1) on beta-HCH and -13 molecules min(-1) on delta-HCH. Additionally, a mutation I253 M in the active site of the enzyme was found to drastically decrease the enzyme activity on beta-HCH. Taking into consideration the wide range of substrates of haloalkane dehalogenases, such a protocol for inclusion body refolding will contribute to the field of bioremediation technology development for organochlorines, specifically HCH. Such a protocol for refolding of haloalkane dehalogenases from inclusion bodies has not been developed or reported before.
        
Title: Transformation of short-chain chlorinated paraffins and olefins with the bacterial dehalogenase LinB from Sphingobium Indicum - Kinetic models for the homologue-specific conversion of reactive and persistent material Knobloch MC, Schinkel L, Kohler HE, Mathis F, Kern S, Bleiner D, Heeb NV Ref: Chemosphere, 283:131199, 2021 : PubMed
Structure, reactivity and physico-chemical properties of polyhalogenated compounds determine their up-take, transport, bio-accumulation, transformation and toxicity and their environmental fate. In technical mixtures of chlorinated paraffins (CPs), these properties are distributed due to the presence of thousands of homologues. We hypothesized that roles of CP dehalogenation reactions, catalyzed by the haloalkane dehalogenase LinB, depend on structural properties of the substrates, e.g. chlorination degree and carbon-chain length. We exposed mixtures of chlorinated undecanes, dodecanes and tridecanes in-vitro to LinB from Sphingobium Indicum bacteria. These single-chain CP-materials also contain small amounts of chlorinated olefins (COs), which can be distinct by mathematical deconvolution of respective mass-spectra. With this procedure, we obtained homologue-specific transformation kinetics of substrates differing in saturation degree, chlorination degree and carbon chain-length. For all homologues, two-stage first-order kinetic models were established, which described the faster conversion of reactive material and the slower transformation of more persistent material. Half-lifes of 0.5-3.2 h and 56-162 h were determined for more reactive and more persistent CP-material. Proportions of persistent material increased steadily from 18 to 67% for lower (Cl(6)) to higher (Cl(11)) chlorinated paraffins and olefins. Conversion efficiencies decreased with increasing chlorination degree from 97 to 70%. Carbon-chain length had only minor effects on transformation rates. Hence, the conversion was faster and more efficient for lower-chlorinated material, and slower for higher-chlorinated and longer-chained CPs and COs. Current legislation has banned short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) and forced a transition to longer-chain CPs. This may be counterproductive with regard to enzymatic transformation with LinB.
Substrate inhibition is the most common deviation from Michaelis-Menten kinetics, occurring in approximately 25% of known enzymes. It is generally attributed to the formation of an unproductive enzyme-substrate complex after the simultaneous binding of two or more substrate molecules to the active site. Here, we show that a single point mutation (L177W) in the haloalkane dehalogenase LinB causes strong substrate inhibition. Surprisingly, a global kinetic analysis suggested that this inhibition is caused by binding of the substrate to the enzyme-product complex. Molecular dynamics simulations clarified the details of this unusual mechanism of substrate inhibition: Markov state models indicated that the substrate prevents the exit of the halide product by direct blockage and/or restricting conformational flexibility. The contributions of three residues forming the possible substrate inhibition site (W140A, F143L and I211L) to the observed inhibition were studied by mutagenesis. An unusual synergy giving rise to high catalytic efficiency and reduced substrate inhibition was observed between residues L177W and I211L, which are located in different access tunnels of the protein. These results show that substrate inhibition can be caused by substrate binding to the enzyme-product complex and can be controlled rationally by targeted amino acid substitutions in enzyme access tunnels.
Transport of ligands between buried active sites and bulk solvent is a key step in the catalytic cycle of many enzymes. Absence of evolutionary optimized transport tunnels is an important barrier limiting the efficiency of biocatalysts prepared by computational design. Creating a structurally defined and functional -Yhole into the protein represents an engineering challenge. Here we describe the computational design and directed evolution of a de novo transport tunnel in haloalkane dehalogenase. Mutants with a blocked native tunnel and newly opened auxiliary tunnel in a distinct part of the structure showed dramatically modified properties. The mutants with blocked tunnels acquired specificity never observed with native family members, up to 32-times increased substrate inhibition and 17-times reduced catalytic rates. Opening of the auxiliary tunnel resulted in specificity and substrate inhibition similar to the native enzyme, and the most proficient haloalkane dehalogenase reported to date (kcat = 57 s-1 with 1,2-dibromoethane at 37oC and pH=8.6). Crystallographic analysis and molecular dynamics simulations confirmed successful introduction of structur-ally defined and functional transport tunnel. Our study demonstrates that whereas we can open the transport tunnels with reasonable proficiency, we cannot accurately predict the effects of such change on the catalytic properties. We propose that one way to increase efficiency of an enzyme is the direct its substrates and products into spatially distinct tunnels. The results clearly show the benefits of enzymes with de novo transport tunnels and we anticipate that this engineering strategy will facilitate creation of a wide range of useful biocatalysts.
Haloalkane dehalogenases are microbial enzymes that convert a broad range of halogenated aliphatic compounds to their corresponding alcohols by the hydrolytic mechanism. These enzymes play an important role in the biodegradation of various environmental pollutants. Haloalkane dehalogenase LinB isolated from a soil bacterium Sphingobium japonicum UT26 has a relatively broad substrate specificity and can be applied in bioremediation and biosensing of environmental pollutants. The LinB variants presented here, LinB32 and LinB70, were constructed with the goal of studying the effect of mutations on enzyme functionality. In the case of LinB32 (L117W), the introduced mutation leads to blocking of the main tunnel connecting the deeply buried active site with the surrounding solvent. The other variant, LinB70 (L44I, H107Q), has the second halide-binding site in a position analogous to that in the related haloalkane dehalogenase DbeA from Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA94. Both LinB variants were successfully crystallized and full data sets were collected for native enzymes as well as their complexes with the substrates 1,2-dibromoethane (LinB32) and 1-bromobutane (LinB70) to resolutions ranging from 1.6 to 2.8 A. The two mutants crystallize differently from each other, which suggests that the mutations, although deep inside the molecule, can still affect the protein crystallizability.
        
Title: Draft Genome Sequence of Sphingobium ummariense Strain RL-3, a Hexachlorocyclohexane-Degrading Bacterium Kohli P, Dua A, Sangwan N, Oldach P, Khurana JP, Lal R Ref: Genome Announc, 1:, 2013 : PubMed
Here, we report the draft genome sequence of the hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)-degrading bacterium Sphingobium ummariense strain RL-3, which was isolated from the HCH dumpsite located in Lucknow, India (27 degrees 00'N and 81 degrees 09'E). The annotated draft genome sequence (4.75 Mb) of strain RL-3 consisted of 139 contigs, 4,645 coding sequences, and 65% G+C content.
        
Title: Draft Genome Sequence of Sphingobium sp. Strain HDIPO4, an Avid Degrader of Hexachlorocyclohexane Mukherjee U, Kumar R, Mahato NK, Khurana JP, Lal R Ref: Genome Announc, 1:, 2013 : PubMed
Sphingobium sp. strain HDIPO4 was isolated from a hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) dumpsite and degraded HCH isomers rapidly. The draft genome sequence of HDIPO4 (~4.7 Mbp) contains 143 contigs and 4,646 coding sequences with a G+C content of 65%.
Sphingobium indicum B90A, an efficient degrader of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) isomers, was isolated in 1990 from sugarcane rhizosphere soil in Cuttack, India. Here we report the draft genome sequence of this bacterium, which has now become a model system for understanding the genetics, biochemistry, and physiology of HCH degradation.
An enzyme's substrate specificity is one of its most important characteristics. The quantitative comparison of broad-specificity enzymes requires the selection of a homogenous set of substrates for experimental testing, determination of substrate-specificity data and analysis using multivariate statistics. We describe a systematic analysis of the substrate specificities of nine wild-type and four engineered haloalkane dehalogenases. The enzymes were characterized experimentally using a set of 30 substrates selected using statistical experimental design from a set of nearly 200 halogenated compounds. Analysis of the activity data showed that the most universally useful substrates in the assessment of haloalkane dehalogenase activity are 1-bromobutane, 1-iodopropane, 1-iodobutane, 1,2-dibromoethane and 4-bromobutanenitrile. Functional relationships among the enzymes were explored using principal component analysis. Analysis of the untransformed specific activity data revealed that the overall activity of wild-type haloalkane dehalogenases decreases in the following order: LinB~DbjA>DhlA~DhaA~DbeA~DmbA>DatA~DmbC~DrbA. After transforming the data, we were able to classify haloalkane dehalogenases into four SSGs (substrate-specificity groups). These functional groups are clearly distinct from the evolutionary subfamilies, suggesting that phylogenetic analysis cannot be used to predict the substrate specificity of individual haloalkane dehalogenases. Structural and functional comparisons of wild-type and mutant enzymes revealed that the architecture of the active site and the main access tunnel significantly influences the substrate specificity of these enzymes, but is not its only determinant. The identification of other structural determinants of the substrate specificity remains a challenge for further research on haloalkane dehalogenases.
        
Title: The lin genes for gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane degradation in Sphingomonas sp. MM-1 proved to be dispersed across multiple plasmids Tabata M, Endo R, Ito M, Ohtsubo Y, Kumar A, Tsuda M, Nagata Y Ref: Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 75:466, 2011 : PubMed
A gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)-degrading bacterium, Sphingomonas sp. MM-1, was isolated from soil contaminated with HCH isomers. Cultivation of MM-1 in the presence of gamma-HCH led to the detection of five gamma-HCH metabolites, gamma-pentachlorocyclohexene, 2,5-dichloro-2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-diol, 2,5-dichlorohydroquinone, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, and 2,5-dichlorophenol, strongly suggesting that MM-1 has the lin genes for gamma-HCH degradation originally identified in the well-studied gamma-HCH-degrading strain Sphingobium japonicum UT26. Southern blot, PCR amplification, and sequencing analyses indicated that MM-1 has seven lin genes for the conversion of gamma-HCH to beta-ketoadipate (six structural genes, linA to linF, and one regulatory gene, linR). MM-1 carried four plasmids, of 200, 50, 40, and 30 kb. Southern blot analysis revealed that all seven lin genes were dispersed across three of the four plasmids, and that IS6100, often found close to the lin genes, was present on all four plasmids.
Sphingobium japonicum strain UT26 utilizes gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH), a man-made chlorinated pesticide that causes serious environmental problems due to its toxicity and long persistence, as a sole source of carbon and energy. Here, we report the complete genome sequence of UT26, which consists of two chromosomes and three plasmids. The 15 lin genes involved in gamma-HCH degradation are dispersed on the two chromosomes and one of the three plasmids.
        
Title: Genetic diversity of gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading sphingomonads isolated from a single experimental field Yamamoto S, Otsuka S, Murakami Y, Nishiyama M, Senoo K Ref: Lett Appl Microbiol, 49:472, 2009 : PubMed
AIMS: To isolate gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)-degrading bacteria from a single field and to examine their genetic diversity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Gamma-HCH-degrading bacteria were screened from a long-term experimental field in which gamma-HCH has been continuously applied to, and a gamma-HCH-degrading sphingomonad strain SS86 was isolated from in 1986. As the result, five strains of sphingomonads were newly isolated. The sequences of several housekeeping genes separated the six strains, including SS86, into two genotypes. Among the genes involved in gamma-HCH degradation, the sequences of linC, linD and linE were identical among all six strains, that of linA was identical among five strains, and that of linB was diverse. CONCLUSIONS: We calculated that the gamma-HCH-degrading populations of the two genotypes arose independently. Not just one but diverse sphingomonads that degrade a particular xenobiotic compound possibly tend to arise and/or accumulate in fields, where that compound has been applied. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study indicates the potential usefulness of a long-term continuous application of xenobiotic compounds to an experimental field in that it would potentially generate diverse micro-organisms able to degrade the compounds.
        
Title: Insertion sequence-based cassette PCR: cultivation-independent isolation of gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading genes from soil DNA Fuchu G, Ohtsubo Y, Ito M, Miyazaki R, Ono A, Nagata Y, Tsuda M Ref: Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 79:627, 2008 : PubMed
gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) is a highly chlorinated pesticide that has caused serious environmental problems. Based on the frequently observed association of insertion sequence IS6100 with lin genes for gamma-HCH degradation in several gamma-HCH-degrading bacterial strains isolated to date, DNA fragments flanked by two copies of IS6100 were amplified by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique using a DNA sample extracted from soil contaminated with HCH. Four distinct DNA fragments with sizes of 6.6, 2.6, 1.6, and 1.3 kb were obtained, three of which carried lin genes: the 6.6-kb fragment carried linD and linE as well as linR; the 2.6-kb fragment showed a truncated form of linF; and the 1.6-kb fragment carried linB. Our approach, named as insertion sequence (IS)-based cassette PCR, was successful in the isolation of the lin genes from HCH-contaminated soil without cultivation of host cells and is applicable for the culture-independent isolation of other functional genes bordered by other IS elements.
        
Title: Isolation of hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading Sphingomonas sp. by dehalogenase assay and characterization of genes involved in gamma-HCH degradation Manickam N, Reddy MK, Saini HS, Shanker R Ref: J Appl Microbiol, 104:952, 2008 : PubMed
AIM: To screen and identify bacteria from contaminated soil samples which can degrade hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)-isomers based on dechlorinase enzyme activity and characterize genes and metabolites. METHODS AND RESULTS: Dechlorinase activity assays were used to screen bacteria from contaminated soil samples for HCH-degrading activity. A bacterium able to grow on alpha-, beta-, gamma- and delta-HCH as the sole carbon and energy source was identified. This bacterium was a novel species belonging to the Sphingomonas and harbour linABCDE genes similar to those found in other HCH degraders. Gamma-pentachlorocyclohexene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene and chlorohydroquinone were identified as metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that HCH-degrading bacteria can be identified from large environmental sample-based dehalogenase enzyme assay. This kind of screening is more advantageous compared to selective enrichment as it is specific and rapid and can be performed in a high-throughput manner to screen bacteria for chlorinated compounds. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The chlorinated pesticide HCH is a persistent and toxic environmental pollutant which needs to be remediated. Isolation of diverse bacterial species capable of degrading all the isomers of HCH will help in large-scale bioremediation in various parts of the world.
        
Title: Degradation of beta-hexachlorocyclohexane by haloalkane dehalogenase LinB from gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane-utilizing bacterium Sphingobium sp. MI1205 Ito M, Prokop Z, Klvana M, Otsubo Y, Tsuda M, Damborsky J, Nagata Y Ref: Arch Microbiol, 188:313, 2007 : PubMed
The technical formulation of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) mainly consists of the insecticidal gamma-isomer and noninsecticidal alpha-, beta-, and delta-isomers, among which beta-HCH is the most recalcitrant and has caused serious environmental problems. A gamma-HCH-utilizing bacterial strain, Sphingobium sp. MI1205, was isolated from soil which had been contaminated with HCH isomers. This strain degraded beta-HCH more rapidly than the well-characterized gamma-HCH-utilizing strain Sphingobium japonicum UT26. In MI1205, beta-HCH was converted to 2,3,5,6-tetrachlorocyclohexane-1,4-diol (TCDL) via 2,3,4,5,6-pentachlorocyclohexanol (PCHL). A haloalkane dehalogenase LinB (LinB(MI)) that is 98% identical (seven amino-acid differences among 296 amino acids) to LinB from UT26 (LinB(UT)) was identified as an enzyme responsible for the two-step conversion of beta-HCH to TCDL. This property of LinB(MI) contrasted with that of LinB(UT), which catalyzed only the first step conversion of beta-HCH to PCHL. Site-directed mutagenesis and computer modeling suggested that two of the seven different amino acid residues (V134 and H247) forming a catalytic pocket of LinB are important for the binding of PCHL in an orientation suitable for the reaction in LinB(MI). However, mutagenesis also indicated the involvement of other residues for the activity unique to LinB(MI). Sequence analysis revealed that MI1205 possesses the IS6100-flanked cluster that contains two copies of the linB (MI) gene. This cluster is identical to the one located on the exogenously isolated plasmid pLB1, suggesting that MI1205 had recruited the linB genes by a horizontal transfer event.
        
Title: A novel pathway for the biodegradation of gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane by a Xanthomonas sp. strain ICH12 Manickam N, Misra R, Mayilraj S Ref: J Appl Microbiol, 102:1468, 2007 : PubMed
AIM: To isolate gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)-degrading bacteria from contaminated soil and characterize the metabolites formed and the genes involved in the degradation pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: A bacterial strain Xanthomonas sp. ICH12, capable of biodegrading gamma- HCH was isolated from HCH-contaminated soil. DNA-colony hybridization method was employed to detect bacterial populations containing specific gene sequences of the gamma-HCH degradation pathway. linA (dehydrodehalogenase), linB (hydrolytic dehalogenase) and linC (dehydrogenase) from a Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26, reportedly possessing gamma-HCH degradation activity, were used as gene probes against isolated colonies. The isolate was found to grow and utilize gamma-HCH as the sole carbon and energy source. The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence of the isolate resulted in its identification as a Xanthomonas species, and we designated it as strain ICH12. During the degradation of gamma-HCH by ICH12, formation of two intermediates, gamma-2,3,4,5,6-pentachlorocyclohexene (gamma-PCCH), and 2,5-dichlorobenzoquinone (2,5-DCBQ), were identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometric (GC-MS) analysis. While gamma-PCCH was reported previously, 2,5-dichlorohydroquinone was a novel metabolite from HCH degradation. CONCLUSIONS: A Xanthomonas sp. for gamma-HCH degradation from a contaminated soil was isolated. gamma-HCH was utilized as sole source of carbon and energy, and the degradation proceeds by successive dechlorination. Two degradation products gamma-PCCH and 2,5-DCBQ were characterized, and the latter metabolite was not known in contrasts with the previous studies. The present work, for the first time, demonstrates the potential of a Xanthomonas species to degrade a recalcitrant and widespread pollutant like gamma-HCH. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study demonstrates the isolation and characterization of a novel HCH-degrading bacterium. Further results provide an insight into the novel degradation pathway which may exist in diverse HCH-degrading bacteria in contaminated soils leading to bioremediation of gamma-HCH.
        
Title: Weak activity of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB with 1,2,3-trichloropropane revealed by X-Ray crystallography and microcalorimetry Monincova M, Prokop Z, Vevodova J, Nagata Y, Damborsky J Ref: Applied Environmental Microbiology, 73:2005, 2007 : PubMed
1,2,3-Trichloropropane (TCP) is a highly toxic and recalcitrant compound. Haloalkane dehalogenases are bacterial enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of a carbon-halogen bond in a wide range of organic halogenated compounds. Haloalkane dehalogenase LinB from Sphingobium japonicum UT26 has, for a long time, been considered inactive with TCP, since the reaction cannot be easily detected by conventional analytical methods. Here we demonstrate detection of the weak activity (k(cat) = 0.005 s(-1)) of LinB with TCP using X-ray crystallography and microcalorimetry. This observation makes LinB a useful starting material for the development of a new biocatalyst toward TCP by protein engineering. Microcalorimetry is proposed to be a universal method for the detection of weak enzymatic activities. Detection of these activities is becoming increasingly important for engineering novel biocatalysts using the scaffolds of proteins with promiscuous activities.
        
Title: Selective loss of lin genes from hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading Pseudomonas aeruginosa ITRC-5 under different growth conditions Singh AK, Chaudhary P, Macwan AS, Diwedi UN, Kumar A Ref: Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 76:895, 2007 : PubMed
The chlorinated insecticide gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) is sequentially metabolized by the products of linA, linB, linC, linD, linE, and linF genes to beta-ketoadipate, which is subsequently mineralized. Two or more copies of these genes are present in the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa ITRC-5 that was isolated earlier by selective enrichment on technical-HCH. At least one copy of linA, linB, linC, linD, and possibly linE is lost from ITRC-5 upon its growth on gamma-HCH. All the lin genes, however, are lost when the bacterium was grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. The loss of lin genes is accompanied with the loss/rearrangement of insertion sequence IS6100 genes. Concomitant to the loss of lin genes, the degradation of HCH-isomers by "gamma-HCH grown cells" is slower, when compared with "technical-HCH grown cells", and is completely lost by "LB-grown cells". The selective loss of lin genes during different growth conditions has not been reported before and is expected to help in understanding the dynamism of degradative genes.
        
Title: A gene linB2 responsible for the conversion of beta-HCH and 2,3,4,5,6-pentachlorocyclohexanol in Sphingomonas sp. BHC-A Wu J, Hong Q, Han P, He J, Li S Ref: Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 73:1097, 2007 : PubMed
Commercial formulations of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) consist of a mixture of four isomers: alpha, beta, gamma, and delta. All four isomers are toxic and recalcitrant pollutants. beta-HCH is more problematic due to its longer persistence in the environment. Sphingomonas sp. BHC-A was able to degrade not only alpha-, gamma-, and delta-HCH but also beta-HCH. To clone a gene responsible for the degradation of beta-HCH, a Tn5 mutation was introduced into BHC-A, and one mutant BHC-A45 defective in beta-HCH degradation was selected. Sequencing analysis showed this mutant had a Tn5 insertion at the site of one haloalkane dehalogenase gene, designated linB2. linB2 was overexpressed in Escherichia coli and the 32-kDa product LinB2 showed the conversion activity of not only beta-HCH to beta-2,3,4,5,6-pentachlorocyclohexanol (beta-PCHL) but also beta-PCHL to beta-2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-1,4-cyclohexanediol.
        
Title: Complete nucleotide sequence of an exogenously isolated plasmid, pLB1, involved in gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane degradation Miyazaki R, Sato Y, Ito M, Ohtsubo Y, Nagata Y, Tsuda M Ref: Applied Environmental Microbiology, 72:6923, 2006 : PubMed
The alpha-proteobacterial strain Sphingobium japonicum UT26 utilizes a highly chlorinated pesticide, gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH), as a sole source of carbon and energy, and haloalkane dehalogenase LinB catalyzes the second step of gamma-HCH degradation in UT26. Functional complementation of a linB mutant of UT26, UT26DB, was performed by the exogenous plasmid isolation technique using HCH-contaminated soil, leading to our successful identification of a plasmid, pLB1, carrying the linB gene. Complete sequencing analysis of pLB1, with a size of 65,998 bp, revealed that it carries (i) 50 totally annotated coding sequences, (ii) an IS6100 composite transposon containing two copies of linB, and (iii) potential genes for replication, maintenance, and conjugative transfer with low levels of similarity to other homologues. A minireplicon assay demonstrated that a 2-kb region containing the predicted repA gene and its upstream region of pLB1 functions as an autonomously replicating unit in UT26. Furthermore, pLB1 was conjugally transferred from UT26DB to other alpha-proteobacterial strains but not to any of the beta- or gamma-proteobacterial strains examined to date. These results suggest that this exogenously isolated novel plasmid contributes to the dissemination of at least some genes for gamma-HCH degradation in the natural environment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first detailed report of a plasmid involved in gamma-HCH degradation.
Haloalkane dehalogenases are microbial enzymes that cleave a carbon-halogen bond in halogenated compounds. The haloalkane dehalogenase LinB, isolated from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26, is a broad-specificity enzyme. Fifty-five halogenated aliphatic and cyclic hydrocarbons were tested for dehalogenation with the LinB enzyme. The compounds for testing were systematically selected using a statistical experimental design. Steady-state kinetic constants K(m) and k(cat) were determined for 25 substrates that showed detectable cleavage by the enzyme and low abiotic hydrolysis. Classical quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) were used to correlate the kinetic constants with molecular descriptors and resulted in a model that explained 94% of the experimental data variability. The binding affinity of the tested substrates for this haloalkane dehalogenase correlated with hydrophobicity, molecular surface, dipole moment, and volume:surface ratio. Binding of the substrate molecules in the active site pocket of LinB depends nonlinearly on the size of the molecules. Binding affinity increases with increasing substrate size up to a chain length of six carbon atoms and then decreases. Comparative binding energy (COMBINE) analysis was then used to identify amino acid residues in LinB that modulate its substrate specificity. A model with three statistically significant principal components explained 95% of the experimental data variability. van der Waals interactions between substrate molecules and the enzyme dominated the COMBINE model, in agreement with the importance of substrate size in the classical QSAR model. Only a limited number of protein residues (6-8%) contribute significantly to the explanation of variability in binding affinities. The amino acid residues important for explaining variability in binding affinities are as follows: (i) first-shell residues Asn38, Asp108, Trp109, Glu132, Ile134, Phe143, Phe151, Phe169, Val173, Trp207, Pro208, Ile211, Leu248, and His272, (ii) tunnel residues Pro144, Asp147, Leu177, and Ala247, and (iii) second-shell residues Pro39 and Phe273. The tunnel and the second-shell residues represent the best targets for modulating specificity since their replacement does not lead to loss of functionality by disruption of the active site architecture. The mechanism of molecular adaptation toward a different specificity is discussed on the basis of quantitative comparison of models derived for two protein family members.
The organization of lin genes and IS6100 was studied in three strains of Sphingomonas paucimobilis (B90A, Sp+, and UT26) which degraded hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) isomers but which had been isolated at different geographical locations. DNA-DNA hybridization data revealed that most of the lin genes in these strains were associated with IS6100, an insertion sequence classified in the IS6 family and initially found in Mycobacterium fortuitum. Eleven, six, and five copies of IS6100 were detected in B90A, Sp+, and UT26, respectively. IS6100 elements in B90A were sequenced from five, one, and one regions of the genomes of B90A, Sp+, and UT26, respectively, and were found to be identical. DNA-DNA hybridization and DNA sequencing of cosmid clones also revealed that S. paucimobilis B90A contains three and two copies of linX and linA, respectively, compared to only one copy of these genes in strains Sp+ and UT26. Although the copy number and the sequence of the remaining genes of the HCH degradative pathway (linB, linC, linD, and linE) were nearly the same in all strains, there were striking differences in the organization of the linA genes as a result of replacement of portions of DNA sequences by IS6100, which gave them a strange mosaic configuration. Spontaneous deletion of linD and linE from B90A and of linA from Sp+ occurred and was associated either with deletion of a copy of IS6100 or changes in IS6100 profiles. The evidence gathered in this study, coupled with the observation that the G+C contents of the linA genes are lower than that of the remaining DNA sequence of S. paucimobilis, strongly suggests that all these strains acquired the linA gene through horizontal gene transfer mediated by IS6100. The association of IS6100 with the rest of the lin genes further suggests that IS6100 played a role in shaping the current lin gene organization.
        
Title: Crystal structure of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 at 0.95 A resolution: dynamics of catalytic residues Oakley AJ, Klvana M, Otyepka M, Nagata Y, Wilce MC, Damborsky J Ref: Biochemistry, 43:870, 2004 : PubMed
We present the structure of LinB, a 33-kDa haloalkane dehalogenase from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26, at 0.95 A resolution. The data have allowed us to directly observe the anisotropic motions of the catalytic residues. In particular, the side-chain of the catalytic nucleophile, Asp108, displays a high degree of disorder. It has been modeled in two conformations, one similar to that observed previously (conformation A) and one strained (conformation B) that approached the catalytic base (His272). The strain in conformation B was mainly in the C(alpha)-C(beta)-C(gamma) angle (126 degrees ) that deviated by 13.4 degrees from the "ideal" bond angle of 112.6 degrees. On the basis of these observations, we propose a role for the charge state of the catalytic histidine in determining the geometry of the catalytic residues. We hypothesized that double-protonation of the catalytic base (His272) reduces the distance between the side-chain of this residue and that of the Asp108. The results of molecular dynamics simulations were consistent with the structural data showing that protonation of the His272 side-chain nitrogen atoms does indeed reduce the distance between the side-chains of the residues in question, although the simulations failed to demonstrate the same degree of strain in the Asp108 C(alpha)-C(beta)-C(gamma) angle. Instead, the changes in the molecular dynamics structures were distributed over several bond and dihedral angles. Quantum mechanics calculations on LinB with 1-chloro-2,2-dimethylpropane as a substrate were performed to determine which active site conformations and protonation states were most likely to result in catalysis. It was shown that His272 singly protonated at N(delta)(1) and Asp108 in conformation A gave the most exothermic reaction (DeltaH = -22 kcal/mol). With His272 doubly protonated at N(delta)(1) and N(epsilon)(2), the reactions were only slightly exothermic or were endothermic. In all calculations starting with Asp108 in conformation B, the Asp108 C(alpha)-C(beta)-C(gamma) angle changed during the reaction and the Asp108 moved to conformation A. The results presented here indicate that the positions of the catalytic residues and charge state of the catalytic base are important for determining reaction energetics in LinB.
Haloalkane dehalogenases are bacterial enzymes capable of carbon-halogen bond cleavage in halogenated compounds. To obtain insights into the mechanism of the haloalkane dehalogenase from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 (LinB), we studied the steady-state and presteady-state kinetics of the conversion of the substrates 1-chlorohexane, chlorocyclohexane, and bromocyclohexane. The results lead to a proposal of a minimal kinetic mechanism consisting of three main steps: (i) substrate binding, (ii) cleavage of the carbon-halogen bond with simultaneous formation of an alkyl-enzyme intermediate, and (iii) hydrolysis of the alkyl-enzyme intermediate. Release of both products, halide and alcohol, is a fast process that was not included in the reaction mechanism as a distinct step. Comparison of the kinetic mechanism of LinB with that of haloalkane dehalogenase DhlA from Xantobacter autotrophicus GJ10 and the haloalkane dehalogenase DhaA from Rhodococcus rhodochrous NCIMB 13064 shows that the overall mechanisms are similar. The main difference is in the rate-limiting step, which is hydrolysis of the alkylenzyme intermediate in LinB, halide release in DhlA, and liberation of an alcohol in DhaA. The occurrence of different rate-limiting steps for three enzymes that belong to the same protein family indicates that extrapolation of this important catalytic property from one enzyme to another can be misleading even for evolutionary closely related proteins. The differences in the rate-limiting step were related to: (i) number and size of the entrance tunnels, (ii) protein flexibility, and (iii) composition of the halide-stabilizing active site residues based on comparison of protein structures.
        
Title: Haloalkane dehalogenase LinB from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26: X-ray crystallographic studies of dehalogenation of brominated substrates Streltsov VA, Prokop Z, Damborsky J, Nagata Y, Oakley A, Wilce MC Ref: Biochemistry, 42:10104, 2003 : PubMed
The haloalkane dehalogenases are detoxifying enzymes that convert a broad range of halogenated substrates to the corresponding alcohols. Complete crystal structures of haloalkane dehalogenase from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 (LinB), and complexes of LinB with 1,2-propanediol/1-bromopropane-2-ol and 2-bromo-2-propene-1-ol, products of debromination of 1,2-dibromopropane and 2,3-dibromopropene, respectively, were determined from 1.8 A resolution X-ray diffraction data. Published structures of native LinB and its complex with 1,3-propanediol [Marek et al. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 14082-14086] were reexamined. The full and partial debromination of 1,2-dibromopropane and 2,3-dibromopropene, respectively, conformed to the observed general trend that the sp(3)-hybridized carbon is the predominant electrophilic site for the S(N)2 bimolecular nucleophilic substitution in dehalogenation reaction. The 2-bromo-2-propene-1-ol product of 2,3-dibromopropene dehalogenation in crystal was positively identified by the gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) technique. The 1,2-propanediol and 1-bromopropane-2-ol products of 1,2-dibromopropane dehalogenation in crystal were also supported by the GC-MS identification. Comparison of native LinB with its complexes showed high flexibility of residues 136-157, in particular, Asp146 and Glu147, from the cap domain helices alpha(4) and alpha(5)('). Those residues were shifted mainly in direction toward the ligand molecules in the complex structures. It seems the cap domain moves nearer to the core squeezing substrate into the active center closer to the catalytic triad. This also leads to slight contraction of the whole complex structures. The flexibility detected by crystallographic analysis is in remarkable agreement with flexibility observed by molecular dynamic simulations.
Haloalkane dehalogenases catalyze cleavage of the carbon-halogen bond in halogenated aliphatic compounds, resulting in the formation of an alcohol, a halide, and a proton as the reaction products. Three structural features of haloalkane dehalogenases are essential for their catalytic performance: (i) a catalytic triad, (ii) an oxyanion hole, and (iii) the halide-stabilizing residues. Halide-stabilizing residues are not structurally conserved among different haloalkane dehalogenases. The level of stabilization of the transition state structure of S(N)2 reaction and halide ion provided by each of the active site residues in the enzymes DhlA, LinB, and DhaA was quantified by quantum mechanic calculations. The residues that significantly stabilize the halide ion were assigned as the primary (essential) or the secondary (less important) halide-stabilizing residues. Site-directed mutagenesis was conducted with LinB enzyme to confirm location of its primary halide-stabilizing residues. Asn38Asp, Asn38Glu, Asn38Phe, Asn38Gln, Trp109Leu, Phe151Leu, Phe151Trp, Phe151Tyr, and Phe169Leu mutants of LinB were constructed, purified, and kinetically characterized. The following active site residues were classified as the primary halide-stabilizing residues: Trp125 and Trp175 of DhlA; Asn38 and Trp109 of LinB; and Asn41 and Trp107 of DhaA. All these residues make a hydrogen bond with the halide ion released from the substrate molecule, and their substitution results in enzymes with significantly modified catalytic properties. The following active site residues were classified as the secondary halide-stabilizing residues: Phe172, Pro223, and Val226 of DhlA; Trp207, Pro208, and Ile211 of LinB; and Phe205, Pro206, and Ile209 of DhaA. The differences in the halide stabilizing residues of three haloalkane dehalogenases are discussed in the light of molecular adaptation of these enzymes to their substrates.
Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) has been used extensively against agricultural pests and in public health programs for the control of mosquitoes. Commercial formulations of HCH consist of a mixture of four isomers, alpha, beta, gamma, and delta. While all these isomers pose serious environmental problems, beta-HCH is more problematic due to its longer persistence in the environment. We have studied the degradation of HCH isomers by Sphingomonas paucimobilis strain B90 and characterized the lin genes encoding enzymes from strain B90 responsible for the degradation of HCH isomers. Two nonidentical copies of the linA gene encoding HCH dehydrochlorinase, which were designated linA1 and linA2, were found in S. paucimobilis B90. The linA1 and linA2 genes could be expressed in Escherichia coli, leading to dehydrochlorination of alpha-, gamma-, and delta-HCH but not of beta-HCH, suggesting that S. paucimobilis B90 contains another pathway for the initial steps of beta-HCH degradation. The cloning and characterization of the halidohydrolase (linB), dehydrogenase (linC and linX), and reductive dechlorinase (linD) genes from S. paucimobilis B90 revealed that they share approximately 96 to 99% identical nucleotides with the corresponding genes of S. paucimobilis UT26. No evidence was found for the presence of a linE-like gene, coding for a ring cleavage dioxygenase, in strain B90. The gene structures around the linA1 and linA2 genes of strain B90, compared to those in strain UT26, are suggestive of a recombination between linA1 and linA2, which formed linA of strain UT26.
The hydrolysis of haloalkanes to their corresponding alcohols and inorganic halides is catalyzed by alpha/beta-hydrolases called haloalkane dehalogenases. The study of haloalkane dehalogenases is vital for the development of these enzymes if they are to be utilized for bioremediation of organohalide-contaminated industrial waste. We report the kinetic and structural analysis of the haloalkane dehalogenase from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 (LinB) in complex with each of 1,2-dichloroethane and 1,2-dichloropropane and the reaction product of 1-chlorobutane turnover. Activity studies showed very weak but detectable activity of LinB with 1,2-dichloroethane [0.012 nmol s(-1) (mg of enzyme)(-1)] and 1,2-dichloropropane [0.027 nmol s(-1) (mg of enzyme)(-1)]. These activities are much weaker compared, for example, to the activity of LinB with 1-chlorobutane [68.2 nmol s(-1) (mg of enzyme)(-1)]. Inhibition analysis reveals that both 1,2-dichloroethane and 1,2-dichloropropane act as simple competitive inhibitors of the substrate 1-chlorobutane and that 1,2-dichloroethane binds to LinB with lower affinity than 1,2-dichloropropane. Docking calculations on the enzyme in the absence of active site water molecules and halide ions confirm that these compounds could bind productively. However, when these moieties were included in the calculations, they bound in a manner similar to that observed in the crystal structure. These data provide an explanation for the low activity of LinB with small, chlorinated alkanes and show the importance of active site water molecules and reaction products in molecular docking.
The haloalkane dehalogenase from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 (LinB) is the enzyme involved in the degradation of the important environmental pollutant gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane. The enzyme hydrolyzes a broad range of halogenated cyclic and aliphatic compounds. Here, we present the 1.58 A crystal structure of LinB and the 2.0 A structure of LinB with 1,3-propanediol, a product of debromination of 1,3-dibromopropane, in the active site of the enzyme. The enzyme belongs to the alpha/beta hydrolase family and contains a catalytic triad (Asp108, His272, and Glu132) in the lipase-like topological arrangement previously proposed from mutagenesis experiments. The LinB structure was compared with the structures of haloalkane dehalogenase from Xanthobacter autotrophicus GJ10 and from Rhodococcus sp. and the structural features involved in the adaptation toward xenobiotic substrates were identified. The arrangement and composition of the alpha-helices in the cap domain results in the differences in the size and shape of the active-site cavity and the entrance tunnel. This is the major determinant of the substrate specificity of this haloalkane dehalogenase.
        
Title: Identification of the catalytic triad in the haloalkane dehalogenase from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 Hynkova K, Nagata Y, Takagi M, Damborsky J Ref: FEBS Letters, 446:177, 1999 : PubMed
The haloalkane dehalogenase from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 (LinB) is the enzyme involved in the gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane degradation. This enzyme hydrolyses a broad range of halogenated aliphatic compounds via an alkyl-enzyme intermediate. LinB is believed to belong to the family of alpha/beta-hydrolases which employ a catalytic triad, i.e. nucleophile-histidine-acid, during the catalytic reaction. The position of the catalytic triad within the sequence of LinB was probed by a site-directed mutagenesis. The catalytic triad residues of the haloalkane dehalogenase LinB are proposed to be D108, H272 and E132. The topological location of the catalytic acid (E132) is after the beta-strand six which corresponds to the location of catalytic acid in the pancreatic lipase, but not in the haloalkane dehalogenase of Xanthobacter autotrophicus GJ10 which contains the catalytic acid after the beta-strand seven.
        
Title: Two different types of dehalogenases, LinA and LinB, involved in gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane degradation in Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 are localized in the periplasmic space without molecular processing Nagata Y, Futamura A, Miyauchi K, Takagi M Ref: Journal of Bacteriology, 181:5409, 1999 : PubMed
gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) is one of several highly chlorinated insecticides that cause serious environmental problems. The cellular proteins of a gamma-HCH-degrading bacterium, Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26, were fractionated into periplasmic, cytosolic, and membrane fractions after osmotic shock. Most of two different types of dehalogenase, LinA (gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane dehydrochlorinase) and LinB (1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-1,4-cyclohexadiene halidohydrolase), that are involved in the early steps of gamma-HCH degradation in UT26 was detected in the periplasmic fraction and had not undertaken molecular processing. Furthermore, immunoelectron microscopy clearly showed that LinA and LinB are periplasmic proteins. LinA and LinB both lack a typical signal sequence for export, so they may be secreted into the periplasmic space via a hitherto unknown mechanism.
        
Title: Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 Smatanova I, Nagata Y, Svensson LA, Takagi M, Marek J Ref: Acta Crystallographica D Biol Crystallogr, 55:1231, 1999 : PubMed
Haloalkane hydrolytic dehalogenase LinB from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26, an enzyme which releases chloride or bromide anion from n-halogenated alkanes and has a broad range of substrate specificity, was crystallized using the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method at 278 K. The best crystals were obtained by microseeding with a precipitant containing 18-20%(w/v) PEG 6000, 0.2 M calcium acetate and 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 8.9. The crystals diffract to at least 1.60 A using synchrotron X-ray under cryogenic (100 K) conditions. They belong to the orthorhombic space group P21212 with unit-cell parameters a = 50.29, b = 71.70, c = 72.73 A. The asymmetric unit contains one molecule of the enzyme.
        
Title: Purification and characterization of a haloalkane dehalogenase of a new substrate class from a gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading bacterium, Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 Nagata Y, Miyauchi K, Damborsky J, Manova K, Ansorgova A, Takagi M Ref: Applied Environmental Microbiology, 63:3707, 1997 : PubMed
The linB gene product (LinB), 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-1,4-cyclohexadiene halidohydrolase, which is involved in the degradation of gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane in Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26 (Y. Nagata, T. Nariya, R. Ohtomo, M. Fukuda, K. Yano, and M. Takagi, J. Bacteriol. 175:6403-6410, 1993), was overproduced in E. coli and purified to homogeneity. The molecular mass of LinB was deduced to be 30 kDa by gel filtration chromatography and 32 kDa by electrophoresis on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel, indicating that LiuB is a monomeric enzyme. The optimal pH for activity was 8.2. Not only monochloroalkanes (C3 to C10) but also dichloroalkanes, bromoalkanes, and chlorinated allphatic alcohols were good substrates for LinB, suggesting that LinB shares properties with another haloalkane dehalogenase, DhlA (S. Keuning, D.B. Janssen, and B. Witholt, J. Bacteriol. 163:635-639, 1985), which shows significant similarity to LinB in primary structure (D. B. Janssen, F. Pries, J. van der Ploeg, B. Kazemier, P. Terpstra, and B. Witholt, J. Bacteriol. 171:6791-6799, 1989) but not in substrate specificity. Principal component analysis of substrate activities of various haloalkane dehalogenases suggested that LinB probably constitutes a new substrate specificity class within this group of enzymes.
        
Title: Cloning and sequencing of a dehalogenase gene encoding an enzyme with hydrolase activity involved in the degradation of gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane in Pseudomonas paucimobilis Nagata Y, Nariya T, Ohtomo R, Fukuda M, Yano K, Takagi M Ref: Journal of Bacteriology, 175:6403, 1993 : PubMed
In Pseudomonas paucimobilis UT26, gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) is converted by two steps of dehydrochlorination to a chemically unstable intermediate, 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-1,4-cyclohexadiene (1,4-TCDN), which is then metabolized to 2,5-dichloro-2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-diol (2,5-DDOL) by two steps of hydrolytic dehalogenation via the chemically unstable intermediate 2,4,5-trichloro-2,5-cyclohexadiene-1-ol (2,4,5-DNOL). To clone a gene encoding the enzyme responsible for the conversion of the chemically unstable intermediates 1,4-TCDN and 2,4,5-DNOL, a genomic library of P. paucimobilis UT26 was constructed in Pseudomonas putida PpY101LA into which the linA gene had been introduced by Tn5. An 8-kb BglII fragment from one of the cosmid clones, which could convert gamma-HCH to 2,5-DDOL, was subcloned, and subsequent deletion analyses revealed that a ca. 1.1-kb region was responsible for the activity. Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed an open reading frame (designated the linB gene) of 885 bp within the region. The deduced amino acid sequence of LinB showed significant similarity to hydrolytic dehalogenase, DhlA (D. B. Janssen, F. Pries, J. van der Ploeg, B. Kazemier, P. Terpstra, and B. Witholt, J. Bacteriol. 171:6791-6799, 1989). The protein product of the linB gene was 32 kDa by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Not only 1-chlorobutane but also 1-chlorodecane (C10) and 2-chlorobutane, which are poor substrates for other dehalogenases, were good substrates for LinB, suggesting that LinB may be a member of haloalkane dehalogenases with broad-range specificity for substrates.